Quality & assurance
We hand you the ruler
Every monthly report is written to the same 5-dimension framework — so you can use it to evaluate us, and any other program.
- 1 Authenticity (1–5)
Real problem, real users, checkable feedback?
- 2 Student Ownership (1–5)
Decisions and mistakes are the child’s; AI use is traceable.
- 3 Math Growth (1–5)
Baseline vs now; math shown by task evidence, not drill volume.
- 4 Communication (1–5)
Before/after in bilingual explaining and Q&A, on video.
- 5 Evidence Integrity (1–5)
Continuous evidence, no gap weeks, mentor-verified coverage.
Three red lines
Warning signs — including for us
- Can’t say what your child did last week → the process is out of control.
- Only a polished final artifact, no intermediate versions → authenticity in doubt.
- Promises admission or a score → against how learning works.
Toolkit
10 questions to ask any program
Print it. Ask us. Ask everyone.
- 01Can you show me what my child did last week, with evidence?
- 02Can I see intermediate versions, not just the final result?
- 03How do you tell the child’s work apart from AI’s?
- 04What is the mentor-to-student ratio, and is it public?
- 05What is your written-feedback SLA?
- 06Do you ever promise admission or scores? (The right answer is no.)
- 07Who owns my child’s work and data after we leave?
- 08What is your refund / cooling-off policy?
- 09Can I attend a reconciliation meeting before renewing?
- 10What happens to published material if I withdraw consent?